People Make Research Award- Collaboration

People Make Research, University of Glasgow

I am pleased to share the news that the College of Social Sciences Ethics Committee has been nominated for the University of Glasgow’s People Make Research Collaboration award. Since taking over as College Ethics Lead in January I have been greatly impressed by the constructive comments, professionalism and rigour demonstrated by members of the CoSS Ethics Committee.

The full text of the nomination is below:

The College of Social Science’s team of ethics reviewers play an integral role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of its staff and student’s research projects. This highly skilled and experienced group of colleagues has worked tirelessly to reduce the average completion time of the review process from 82 to 48 days in the last year despite experiencing a 28.8 percent year-on-year increase in the number of applications received. This is a remarkable achievement given also that significant changes have been made to our ethics procedures during the same period.  

Our reviewers go above and beyond to provide constructive guidance to applicants that help them design and deliver high-quality academic research and are crucial for sustaining a collegial and ethically grounded research culture in CoSS. Their commitment is essential to maintaining research excellence across the college and its five Schools. We would like to nominate them for this award in recognition of their substantial contribution to research culture within the College of Social Sciences“.

You can view the list of all nominees on the People Make Research website.

I would like to thank all members of the CoSS Ethics Committee (both past and present) for their hard work. I am also very grateful for the support received from the CoSS Ethics management team of Clare McKinlay, Kalina Raeva, David Clelland, Michelle McGachie, and Rebecca Tapscott.

Social Media and the Belfast Riots: Articles in Sunday Post, Yle (Finland) and Times of Malta

I have three new articles out on the role of social media in the violent disorder seen in Northern Ireland last week.

On Friday I was interviewed by Derek Healey for an article in The Sunday Post. We discussed whether further racist violence was likely over the summer, and the role of social media in fuelling this violence. I suggested that there was a playbook where far-right agitators like Tommy Robinson use their online presence to whip up tensions around immigration. A quote from the interview is below:

“The trouble is that if there’s a sum­mer where we have sev­eral incid­ents where viol­ent crimes or attacks are linked to people of col­our, or there is a sug­ges­tion by someone like Musk or Robin­son that this is about immig­rants, you could well see it play out again.”

The article can be read online here and is below:

I also have an op-ed published in the Times of Malta. This focused on the role of online agitators in the protests and related violence seen in Belfast last year.

Finally, I was interviewed by Vilma Romsi for an YLE (Finland) segment on the riots.

I argued that online platforms were being used to manufacture and manipulate anti-immigrant sentiments in the UK. I pointed out that right-wing agitators and certain media outlets talk a lot about the negative aspects of immigration. This has fuelled a perception within some working-class communities that they are to blame for the social and economic problems they face, irrespective of the evidence. A quote from the article (translated into English) is below:

“Social media influencers and traditional media are drumming up and clinging to immigration in a way that makes it seem like a big deal to ordinary people. In reality, the number of immigrants in Northern Ireland is relatively small,” Reilly says.

Thanks to Vilma for the interview, it can be read (in Finnish) here.

Social Media and the Belfast Riots: Articles in The Conversation, New Statesman and The Times

I have three new articles out on the role of social media in the violent disorder seen in Northern Ireland this week.

On Wednesday I wrote for the  Conversation UK on how social media had been used by far-right agitators like Tommy Robinson to incite violence in Belfast and other towns. I argued that while more could be done to prevent online hate and misinformation, the toxic discourse around immigration was a bigger problem. It can be read in full here.

Yesterday I had an op-ed published in The Times. I posited how facts don’t matter to those seeking to leverage traumatic incidents, such as Monday’s knife attack in North Belfast, to further anti-immigrant agendas. I was also interviewed by David Leask for a report on the protests and related violence in Glasgow.

Finally, I had an article published in The New Statesman yesterday. In this one I reflected on the similarities between this week’s events and the racist violence seen in Ballymena last summer. I discussed the reasons why far-right agitators have been able to mobilise support from working-class loyalist communities, and the role of online platforms in whipping up anti-immigrant sentiments. The piece can be read here (you may need to subscribe to access it).

Many thanks to Charlotte Morris for helping arranging these , and to Nick Harris, David Leask, Dale Miller and Sarah Reid for publishing them.

Interviewed by ZDF on role of social media in Belfast riots

Interview on ZDFheute Nachricten, 10 June

Yesterday I was interviewed by German public service broadcaster ZDF about the racist violence in Northern Ireland over the past few days. Anti-immigration protests and related violence have taken place in Belfast and several other towns in the region, sparked by a knife attack by a Sudanese man on Monday night.

I commented on the role of far-right agitators and online platforms in the coordination of the protests.

Thanks to Joe Evans for the interview. You can view the segment below (from 09:56 onwards).

Interviewed for Kid Reporters Knowledge Exchange Programme

Representing CoSS at Kid Reporters Knowledge Exchange event

In March 2026 I represented the College of Social Sciences in the kid Reporters Knowledge Exchange programme. This collaboration between the University of Glasgow and Hillhead Primary School brought 90 school children to campus to learn more about the media, digital storytelling, and the University’s research.

My contribution revolved around how to stay safe online. The pupils asked a range of questions including whether I enjoyed my job, what my favourite colour was, and of course what cat I would like to be! We then went on a tour of the Advanced Research Centre before the class engaged in other creative sessions on the day including designing zines.

Full details on the Children in Media project can be found here. A video showcasing the project can be viewed below:

Many thanks to the Nicole Smith, Libby Nelson and Charlotte Morris for the invitation to participate, and to Kieran McCarroll for capturing the interviews.


Participant in a panel on AI, misinformation and Scottish election

On Wednesday I was an invited contributor to a panel organised by The Ferret. Entitled AI, misinformation and the Scottish election, the focus was on how best to respond to mis-and disinformation in Scotland.

Ali Brian (The Ferret), Digdem Soyaltin Colella (University of Aberdeen) and I discussed a variety of topics, including how bad actors use AI-images to pollute political discourse online, the vectors of misinformation in contemporary Scotland, and how we can rebuild trust in democratic institutions.

Many thanks to Susannah Fitzgerald for charing, Jamie Mann for the invitation, and our audience for their thought-provoking questions. The session can viewed below.

Please do consider supporting The Ferret, who are doing some fantastic in-depth investigative journalism in Scotland. Full details on how to subscribe can be found here.

Invited seminar on social media and peacebuilding at University of Copenhagen

Invited lecture at University of Copenhagen

Yesterday I delivered a seminar at the University of Copenhagen. Entitled ‘Digital contention in divided societies: how online platforms hinder peacebuilding’, I gave an overview of the type of intergroup contact facilitated by social media to date. Drawing on key findings from my book Digital Contention in a Divided Society, I argued that online platforms are not shared spaces in which positive peace is likely to emerge. Despite the cyberoptimism of projects like Peace on Facebook, they are neither benign nor a force for world peace. Indeed, the hate speech, mis-and disinformation amplified by their sites reinforces negative stereotypes of outgroups which make reconciliation between former antagonists much harder.

The second speaker of the day was Dechun Zhang, who gave an overview of his forthcoming book Digital Nationalism and Affective Governance: Propaganda, Public Sentiment, and Soft Authoritarianism in China. This was a fascinating presentation introducing some of the key theoretical and empirical findings.

Big thanks to Jun Liu for the invite, Dechun for his talk, and to the audience for their contributions. The slides from my presentation can be viewed below.

Interviewed about online abuse directed at Scottish journalists

This week my colleague Catherine Happer and I were interviewed about the normalisation of abuse against journalists in Scotland. The article, published in The National, explored how politicians delegitmise the media and dismiss critical coverage as ‘fake news’. There have even been recent incidents of political aides grabbing journalists mid-question. This abuse of journalists is particularly ominous as we enter the final stages of the 2026 Scottish Parliament election.

A few of my quotes from the article are below:

“It feels as if we are heading in the same direction as the US under Trump,” says Dr Paul Reilly, a Senior Lecturer in Communication, Media and Democracy at the University of Glasgow. “We see UK politicians dismissing critical media coverage as ‘fake news’, trying to avoid legitimate questions from the press by questioning their integrity and motives”

Farage is a case in point, Dr Reilly argues. “Farage has issued statements claiming he was going to boycott the BBC and yet still appears on their programmes,” he says. The contradiction only makes sense if you see the boycott threat as performance: a way to present himself as a victim of a hostile establishment while continuing to use its platforms.

Dr Reilly makes the same point from a different angle. “It certainly reinforces and strengthens existing patterns of distrust in our media and political institutions,” he says.

“It is little wonder that journalists are subjected to abuse and hostility online. Social media users frequently see video footage of political leaders accusing journalists of fabricating stories or trying to smear them – all because they are asking uncomfortable questions or scrutinising the actions and policies of our politicians.”

Dr Reilly cites this evidence, adding: “I would be worried that this trend may result in journalists being threatened, or worse still, attacked by members of the public.”

“This is one of the roots of the information crisis that has seen members of the public become increasingly disillusioned with democracy,” he warns.

Many thanks to Laura Pollock for the interview, which can be read here.

Eighth review of Digital contention in a divided society published in Estudios Irlandeses

The eighth review of Digital Contention in a Divided Society has been published in Estudios Irlandeses . Sarah Ritt (University of Vienna) provides a very comprehensive reflection on the book’s key themes. Some quotes from the review are below:

“Online communities are their own little microcosms. Often either overlooked or blamed for everything wrong with today’s society, the online space has only rather recently become a subject of academic study, probably partly because in order to produce telling results, large datasets need to be retrieved, categorized, and analyzed This is exactly what Paul Reilly does in his monograph Digital Contention in a Divided Society

“In order to root his analysis in the offline world as well, Reilly supplements it with an actors’ analysis of events coverage in main regional newspapers. This keeps his insight from being reduced to the infamous online “bubbles”.”

Digital Contention in a Divided Society: Social Media, Parades and Protests in Northern Ireland is a valuable resource for those working with social media studies who are looking for a comprehensive and triangulated set of data that has been researched with a great amount of consideration for its social / historical contexts and the quantitative care necessary when working with a fast-changing environment such as social media platforms.”

I am very grateful to Sarah for such a thoughtful review of the book, which can be read in full here