Final call for abstracts: Researching Social Media After the API: A One-Day Workshop

Delighted to be involved in organising this great workshop on researching social media research. Please do share widely and submit!

Researching Social Media After the API: A One-Day Workshop

University of Liverpool (and online)

Wednesday 19th June 2024 (exact times to be confirmed!)

Deadline for submission: Friday 24th May 2024

In the recent past, social media platforms became more open about working alongside academic researchers and crucially, enabling academic access to their data in order to facilitate political communication research (and many other forms of research besides). However, this has been dramatically reversed in recent years in what Axel Bruns (2019) has referred to as the “APIcalyspe”. Both Meta and X (formerly Twitter) have withdrawn or sought to restrict access to their platforms for academic research by making it prohibitively expensive. The discipline now stands at a crossroads (Bruns, 2019). Either accept and adapt to the new access arrangements, most likely to the detriment of the scope, volume, and overall quality of the research, or consider methodological innovations and workarounds to examine these platforms central to our everyday existence. To this end, we would like to invite contributions to a one-day workshop to be held in hybrid format (online and in person, at the University of Liverpool), to discuss how we might continue to research social media platforms under these difficult conditions.

Potential topics could include (but are not restricted to):

–          researching the ‘black box’ (documenting and analysing communication on closed platforms such as WhatsApp/Discord/ etc.

–          The significance of small-N case studies

–          Researching dead or declining platforms

–          The ethics of collaborating with technology companies

–          Researching content moderation practices

–          Practical reflections on specific methods

–          Qualitative approaches

Please submit a 300 word abstract outlining the topic of your proposed contribution along with your name and contact information. Please also indicate if you would prefer to contribute online or in person. Abstracts addressing political research topics (broadly defined) will be prioritized. Abstracts and queries should be sent to Emily Harmer: E.Harmer@liverpool.ac.uk by 24th May 2024.

The workshop is funded by DigiPol: Centre for Digital Politics, Media and Democracy at the University of Liverpool. We have a small pot of money to assist with travel costs to attend in person. Priority will be given to PGRs or unwaged/precariously employed colleagues. If you would like to be considered for a travel bursary, please indicate this in your submission so we can assess demand.

Organisers: James Dennis (University of Portsmouth), Emily Harmer (University of Liverpool), Liam McLoughlin (University of Liverpool), Paul Reilly (University of Glasgow) and Ros Southern (University of Liverpool). 

Deconstructing Societal Threats During Times of Deep Mediatization – Book Discussion and Analysis

Deconstructing societal threats during times of deep mediatization, Routledge, 2023.

A few weeks ago we had the long overdue launch event for (De)constructing Societal Threats During Times of Deep Mediatization. Organised by the IAMCR Crisis, Security and Conflict Communication Working Group, we were delighted to be joined by three of the authors (Minos, Olivia and Gregory) for a discussion of their respective chapters. The video can be viewed below:

Recording of book launch event, 16 April 2024

Thanks to our presenters and attendees for the great debate. A description of the book is below.

De)constructing Societal Threats During Times of Deep Mediatization

This book explores how both elite and non-elite actors frame societal threats such as the refugee crisis and COVID-19 using both digital and traditional media. It also explores ways in which the framing of these issues as threatening can be challenged using these platforms.

People typically experience societal threats such as war and terrorism through the media they consume, both on and offline. Much of the research in this area to date focuses on either how political and media elites present these issues to citizens, or audience responses to these frames. This book takes a different approach by focusing on how issues such as the refugee crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic are both constructed and deconstructed in an era of hybrid media. It draws on a range of traditional and innovative research methodologies to explore how these issues are framed as ‘threats’ within deeply mediatized societies, ranging from content analysis of newspaper coverage of the Macedonian name dispute in Greece to investigating conspiratorial communities on YouTube using Systemic Functional Linguistics. In doing so, this book enriches our understanding of not only how civil and uncivil actors frame these issues, but also their impact on societal resilience towards future crises.

(De)constructing Societal Threats During Times of Deep Mediatization will be a key resource for academics, researchers, and advanced students of Communication Studies, Media Studies, Journalism, Cultural Studies, Research Methods, Sociology and Politics.

The chapters included in this book were originally published as a special issue of The Communication Review. Many thanks to our authors for their excellent contributions, which are listed below:

1. Framing the Macedonian name dispute in Greece: Nationalistic journalism and the existential threat
Minos-Athanasios Karyotakis

2. The “ultimate empathy machine” as technocratic solutionism? Audience reception of the distant refugee crisis through virtual reality
Zhe Xu and Mengrong Zhang

3. A systemic functional linguistics approach to analysing white supremacist and conspiratorial Ddscourse on YouTube
Olivia Inwood and Michele Zappavigna

4. Internet regulation and crisis-related resilience: From Covid-19 to existential risks
Gregory Asmolov

The book can be ordered here

Article in The Conversation about social media protections and peacebuilding

I have a new article published in the Conversation UK. In this piece, I argue that the removal of guardrails and safety measures from online platforms makes it harder to promote reconciliation in deeply-divided societies. Drawing on examples such as my own work on Northern Ireland, I suggest that commercial platforms like X (formerly known as Twitter) are not the best place to promote peace. Perhaps a public service internet would be a more suitable forum in which to reconcile former antagonists.

Many thanks to Charlotte Morris, Dale Berning Saw and the Conversation UK for their feedback and assistance in getting this published.

The article can be read here

New blogpost on role of social media in protests and disorder in post-conflict societies

Invited book talk, Leicester, 16 April

I have written an essay for the University of Glasgow Social Sciences Hub on the role of social media in protests and disorder in divided societies. In the piece, I reflect on something I wrote about the 2011 English riots and consider how online platforms are used by citizens to frame contentious issues. I argue that the indirect effects of online incivility seen during divisive events can be detrimental for efforts to promote peace and reconciliation in divided societies.

Thanks to Andrew MacIver for the help in publishing this. It can be read in full here and you can buy a copy of Digital Contention in a Divided Society here.